A Big Question
I have a big question for the Democratic Party. It seems that all they have said and done in the last six years is to bash W. Bush. They have not offered any evidence of a platform or a plan or even an honest opinion about anything other than the need to bash W. I am curious why they are still doing nothing but the above even though they will be running against someone else in the next election. If they keep spending all their energy trying to beat Bush, which; by the way it’s too late to do that, they will be starting and election without a platform and nothing to offer the people of the US other than a lot of negativity.
It’s like the Sheehan farce going on out in Texas. She says Bush won’t meet with her and he already did, right after he son was killed. She has supporters that have been convicted of aiding terrorists. She says The US in not worth dying for. And she wants my sympathy; your sympathy; for what? Her son who volunteered for military service and was so proud of his home that he was willing to die to defend her was killed. Then she disgraces his sacrifice by saying that this country wasn’t worth it. She uses her own son’s tragic death to have her moment in the sun.
I choose to respect the sacrifices of our fallen soldiers and to ignore the shrill voices of those who disgrace the very progeny they pretend to grieve for. Mrs. Sheehan, please shut up and go home. The complete opposite is needed from The Democratic Party. Please speak up. Tell us what you stand for. Tell us who you really are. Shut up about W. Bush and tell us what your vision for this country is. We need choices in the upcoming elections. So far there is the Bush and the Anti-Bush movement. Neither one will be a candidate on ’08.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Gary Hart: Moral Authority - Yahoo! News
Gary Hart: Moral Authority - Yahoo! News: "There are those who earn their moral authority the hard way, by going to jail or, like Cindy Sheehan, by sacricing a loved one. Such people do not merely earn an audience with the president.
Such people deserve an accounting."
This was a very good article and it touched on the real reason that the Democratic Party is falling by the wayside in this country. The real reason is that for the last 12 or 15 years the Dems have become known for never having a point of view and never doing what they promise during campaigns.
Then, Hart has to leap off into total ignorant outer space and mention that disrespectful lady in Texas. She is using taking the grief that should be placed in honoring her son and making a mockery of his death by accusing the President of imposing a sentence on her son that he actually volunteered for. Then, even though her son was a proud volunteer, she demands that President Bush force his children into the same place. I'll wager that her son would NOT approve of her actions.
I'm curious how hard she tried to talk her son out of joining the military. How against war was she before her son's death? If she wasn't anti-war until her son was killed that makes her a selfish and sore loser.
The most sad thing about the whole deal is not her misguided grief but the puppeteers that are pulling her strings. They pull her strings and try their best to make Bush look bad. They don't offer a solution. They don't offer an alternative. They just offer sour grapes and the attitudes of an entire culture of sore losers.
Such people deserve an accounting."
This was a very good article and it touched on the real reason that the Democratic Party is falling by the wayside in this country. The real reason is that for the last 12 or 15 years the Dems have become known for never having a point of view and never doing what they promise during campaigns.
Then, Hart has to leap off into total ignorant outer space and mention that disrespectful lady in Texas. She is using taking the grief that should be placed in honoring her son and making a mockery of his death by accusing the President of imposing a sentence on her son that he actually volunteered for. Then, even though her son was a proud volunteer, she demands that President Bush force his children into the same place. I'll wager that her son would NOT approve of her actions.
I'm curious how hard she tried to talk her son out of joining the military. How against war was she before her son's death? If she wasn't anti-war until her son was killed that makes her a selfish and sore loser.
The most sad thing about the whole deal is not her misguided grief but the puppeteers that are pulling her strings. They pull her strings and try their best to make Bush look bad. They don't offer a solution. They don't offer an alternative. They just offer sour grapes and the attitudes of an entire culture of sore losers.
Monday, August 08, 2005
Why suicide attackers haven't hit U.S. again - Wrong Answer
Why cant the buffoons in the press who created the politically correct ostrich head in the sand society see past their own idiotic creation? Read this ludicrous paragraph.
Why suicide attackers haven't hit U.S. again - Yahoo! News: "'There is no accurate criminal profile for them. Anyone who tells you differently is trying to get on TV,' says Mia Bloom, author of Dying to Kill, a study of suicide terror. 'And if we had a profile, the terrorists would learn about it and use it against us.'"
There IS a profile. Whether you like it or not. There is a profile for a terrorist. Radical Islamic Mle between 20 and 35 years old. There are exceptions to every profile as there is to every rule but that is a good starting place.
This is NOT a racial thing. There are many Arabs and many Muslims Arab and non-Arab in this country that don't fit the profile i just layed out. Religious fanatics whether they are Osama bin-Laden or Roy Moore are the most dangerous people in this country. If they are citizens watch them closely, if not deport them.
Does the fact that Roy Moore is a Martian mean we can launch is embarrassing butt into outer space? Hmm, what a concept.
Why suicide attackers haven't hit U.S. again - Yahoo! News: "'There is no accurate criminal profile for them. Anyone who tells you differently is trying to get on TV,' says Mia Bloom, author of Dying to Kill, a study of suicide terror. 'And if we had a profile, the terrorists would learn about it and use it against us.'"
There IS a profile. Whether you like it or not. There is a profile for a terrorist. Radical Islamic Mle between 20 and 35 years old. There are exceptions to every profile as there is to every rule but that is a good starting place.
This is NOT a racial thing. There are many Arabs and many Muslims Arab and non-Arab in this country that don't fit the profile i just layed out. Religious fanatics whether they are Osama bin-Laden or Roy Moore are the most dangerous people in this country. If they are citizens watch them closely, if not deport them.
Does the fact that Roy Moore is a Martian mean we can launch is embarrassing butt into outer space? Hmm, what a concept.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
David Sirota: How Beltway-itis Rots Reporters Brains & Distorts America's Political Debate - He should know
My big question to David Sirota is how long he has been off the fumes in the beltway? All kidding aside. A faux pa is great in the right place. Read the last patagraph here. Does he think the media actually are "elite?"
David Sirota: How Beltway-itis Rots Reporters Brains & Distorts America's Political Debate - Yahoo! News: "A lot has been written about how, when reporters spend too much time in Washington, D.C., their brains start to rot, and they start spewing back insider gossip and stereotype that is so removed from reality, you think you are reading the rantings of patients in an insane asylum. Case in point is Washington Post reporter Dan Balz - one of the most intellectually impaired reporters working today. "
Thankfully, the brainwashing attempt isn't going to work. As much as the media arrogantly looks down at the public as stupid, the American people are innately smart, especially when elites try to manipulate them.
David Sirota: How Beltway-itis Rots Reporters Brains & Distorts America's Political Debate - Yahoo! News: "A lot has been written about how, when reporters spend too much time in Washington, D.C., their brains start to rot, and they start spewing back insider gossip and stereotype that is so removed from reality, you think you are reading the rantings of patients in an insane asylum. Case in point is Washington Post reporter Dan Balz - one of the most intellectually impaired reporters working today. "
Thankfully, the brainwashing attempt isn't going to work. As much as the media arrogantly looks down at the public as stupid, the American people are innately smart, especially when elites try to manipulate them.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Dog Beats Most in Swim From Alcatraz - Good News

I'm sucker for a good dog story. This is kinda funny.
Dog Beats Most in Swim From Alcatraz - Yahoo! News: "He was the only dog among more than 500 swimmers who lept into the chilly, choppy waters on Saturday, coming in 72nd overall. His time was 41 minutes and 45 seconds.
The crowd cheered as the 4-year-old pooch made his way onto solid ground, shaking sprays of water and dodging a woman who tried to put a medal around his neck."
Wednesday, July 20, 2005
Scratch that nice letter
Alabama Policy Institute Home Page...conservative think tank.: "'Private property shall not be taken for, or applied to public use, unless just compensation be first made therefore; nor shall private property be taken for private use without the consent of the owner' Alabama Constitution of 1901, Sec. 23, Eminent domain."
The preceeding blog entry was about Governor Riley "protecting" Alabamians from the most recent SCOTUS screwup of legislation from the bench. But... Guess what? In Alabama we have been protected from this by our constitution since 1901.
So what does this mean? This means that Governor Riley is going to protect us by softening our constitution to allow factories and the likes to steal our property.
"As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may equally said to have a property in his rights." James Madison.
Get a grip Governor Riley! We see what you're up to.
tonyh
The preceeding blog entry was about Governor Riley "protecting" Alabamians from the most recent SCOTUS screwup of legislation from the bench. But... Guess what? In Alabama we have been protected from this by our constitution since 1901.
So what does this mean? This means that Governor Riley is going to protect us by softening our constitution to allow factories and the likes to steal our property.
"As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may equally said to have a property in his rights." James Madison.
Get a grip Governor Riley! We see what you're up to.
tonyh
Open Letter to the Governor of Alabama, Bob Riley, Supreme Court eminent-domain ruling
States move to blunt effect of Supreme Court eminent-domain ruling: "In Alabama, Republican Gov. Bob Riley is drawing up a bill that would prohibit city and county governments from using eminent domain to take property for retail, office or residential development. It would still allow property to be taken for industrial development, such as new factories, and for roads and schools."
I don't mean to insult you but this measure falls a step short of the protection we deserve. I'm sorry Governor Riley! Do you remember when you ran for election? You ran as a Republican. We (I voted for you) elected a Republican not a Socialist. I'm gonna leave out the tax increase (very Democratic thing to do) that you tried to pull on us. Don't get me wrong. I appreciate the quick action you are taking. Eminent Domain is intended to insure public right of way and for schools and government installations. The key here being "public." When a private business be it a factory, condo or a mall cant find realestate that is too bad for them. They need to try harder to find a good place, not steal fairly and rightfully owned property.
I shuddered when I heard about the SCOTUS ruling on this. As usual they didn't tell the whole truth. The opinions did make clear that it is up to the states to police these practices in their own venue. I live on the Gulf Coast. I hate all those huge condos and then I think of the economic impact and I go... Oh well. But then I see the few smaller land owners there that still have their small houses on the beach and I think what a tragedy it would be to steal there property so that another private owner could build there.
Press on with this legislation but drop the factory stuff. It is NOT OK to take from one private owner to give to another private owner. That is stealing. Keep eminent domain in the public arena and we will all be safe.
Thank you.
Tony Hines
Mobile, Alabama
I don't mean to insult you but this measure falls a step short of the protection we deserve. I'm sorry Governor Riley! Do you remember when you ran for election? You ran as a Republican. We (I voted for you) elected a Republican not a Socialist. I'm gonna leave out the tax increase (very Democratic thing to do) that you tried to pull on us. Don't get me wrong. I appreciate the quick action you are taking. Eminent Domain is intended to insure public right of way and for schools and government installations. The key here being "public." When a private business be it a factory, condo or a mall cant find realestate that is too bad for them. They need to try harder to find a good place, not steal fairly and rightfully owned property.
I shuddered when I heard about the SCOTUS ruling on this. As usual they didn't tell the whole truth. The opinions did make clear that it is up to the states to police these practices in their own venue. I live on the Gulf Coast. I hate all those huge condos and then I think of the economic impact and I go... Oh well. But then I see the few smaller land owners there that still have their small houses on the beach and I think what a tragedy it would be to steal there property so that another private owner could build there.
Press on with this legislation but drop the factory stuff. It is NOT OK to take from one private owner to give to another private owner. That is stealing. Keep eminent domain in the public arena and we will all be safe.
Thank you.
Tony Hines
Mobile, Alabama
Wednesday, July 13, 2005
Suicide Car Bomber Kills 18 Iraqi Kids and Goes to Hell
Today a Suicide bomber went straight to hell. He had no virgins... no reward just hell. He turned out not to be Muslim but a total piece of shit who claimed to be Muslim. Since suicide is against everything Muslim I must assume he is a heretic and went stright to hell... Where he belongs!
Suicide Car Bomber Kills 18 Iraqi Kids - Yahoo! News
Suicide Car Bomber Kills 18 Iraqi Kids - Yahoo! News
Wednesday, July 06, 2005
The World's Most Self Absorbed Woman
Danielle Crittenden: New York's Failed Olympic Bid Fault of �Vast Euro Conspiracy Senator Clinton Charges - Yahoo! News: "My point is that New York deserved this not London. We were the ones attacked on 9/11.
Friends of the senator went further: Hillary herself deserved this, said a close female friend, who asked not to be named. She went to Wellesley. And look what shes had to endure since."
Hillary Clinton really thinks this is all about her. This is the same Senator who rails on Bush for capitalizing on a tragedy, and then thinks that she should use that 911 tragedy to land the Olympics for NYC.
Friends of the senator went further: Hillary herself deserved this, said a close female friend, who asked not to be named. She went to Wellesley. And look what shes had to endure since."
Hillary Clinton really thinks this is all about her. This is the same Senator who rails on Bush for capitalizing on a tragedy, and then thinks that she should use that 911 tragedy to land the Olympics for NYC.
Idaho suspect's records show violent history - Crime & Punishment - MSNBC.com
Idaho suspect's records show violent history - Crime & Punishment - MSNBC.com: "As an alternative to prison, Duncan underwent treatment at the Sex Offender Program and Western State Hospital in Washington state, where he lived during his teenage years. Twenty-two months later, he was kicked out of the program for sneaking off the campus and having rape fantasies, the Times said. A judge then reinstated his 20-year prison sentence in March 1982 and Duncan served 14 years in prison.
Duncan's next encounter with the law came in April, when he was released on $15,000 bail after being charged with molesting a boy in Fargo, N.D. Police in Fargo had been looking for Duncan since May, when he failed to check in with a probation agent. "
Do we even need to ask the question here? Why was he released on bail? Very obviously this chrge would have revoked any probation and popped him back into the slammer. As I read this article I couldnt help see the thread of off the wall apologist bull that makes it look like this guy was a victim and is not responsible for his crimes. "Poor, poor little murdering rapist, it's not his fault..."
Again. There should be some accountability for the people who sat there, parole boards and bail granting judges, and let this freak back out to prey on the communities children. I know this is a dead horse but I have gone from sick & sad to down right angry.
Violent sex offenders should be locked up for life without any chance whatsoever of ever being paroled.
Duncan's next encounter with the law came in April, when he was released on $15,000 bail after being charged with molesting a boy in Fargo, N.D. Police in Fargo had been looking for Duncan since May, when he failed to check in with a probation agent. "
Do we even need to ask the question here? Why was he released on bail? Very obviously this chrge would have revoked any probation and popped him back into the slammer. As I read this article I couldnt help see the thread of off the wall apologist bull that makes it look like this guy was a victim and is not responsible for his crimes. "Poor, poor little murdering rapist, it's not his fault..."
Again. There should be some accountability for the people who sat there, parole boards and bail granting judges, and let this freak back out to prey on the communities children. I know this is a dead horse but I have gone from sick & sad to down right angry.
Violent sex offenders should be locked up for life without any chance whatsoever of ever being paroled.
Idaho Girl Recounts Nightmarish Ordeal - Yahoo! News
Idaho Girl Recounts Nightmarish Ordeal - Yahoo! News: "Shasta and Dylan were repeatedly molested,' Kootenai County Sheriff's Sgt. Brad Maskell wrote in a terse, handwritten affidavit released Tuesday. 'Shasta saw Mr. Duncan molest Dylan.'"
I'm having a real hard time with this whole story as it unfolds. All my adult life I have had a problem with capital punishment. I think the members of the parole board who released this guy should be held criminally liable for this. Sex offenders DO NOT change! I became physically ill, nearly vomited when I read this story and I cant get the tears out of my eyes. Ted bundy is the Easter Bunny up beside this monster. Did I hear someone say "Public Execution!?" The ones who died in this are the lucky ones. This poor little girl will live with this, this... Shit, the rest of her life. We can warm up the Yellow Mama here in Alabama if they're too sensitive out there to do the right thing.
I'm having a real hard time with this whole story as it unfolds. All my adult life I have had a problem with capital punishment. I think the members of the parole board who released this guy should be held criminally liable for this. Sex offenders DO NOT change! I became physically ill, nearly vomited when I read this story and I cant get the tears out of my eyes. Ted bundy is the Easter Bunny up beside this monster. Did I hear someone say "Public Execution!?" The ones who died in this are the lucky ones. This poor little girl will live with this, this... Shit, the rest of her life. We can warm up the Yellow Mama here in Alabama if they're too sensitive out there to do the right thing.
Monday, June 27, 2005
The Seattle Times: Local News: Iraq war claims first woman from Washington state
The Seattle Times: Local News: Iraq war claims first woman from Washington state
Jonathan:
Women are citizens just like men and they deserve the right and privilege of serving in our armed services in any role that they can qualify for following the same guidelines that their male counterparts use for qualification.
Larry(Butch):
It’s about time women risked their lives for the freedoms that they enjoy. By God there are more women in The US than men and only 10% of the force in Iraq! I tell ya its not fair being a man and expected to risk it all while women sit at home and risk nothing.
Juan:
Women are by nature more frail and weaker and shouldn’t be exposed to the rigors and risks involved in combat. While I feel that they are equal in other ways I think that’s a bit unrealistic to think that they would be involved in combat. What would happen in a hand-to-hand situation? Goodness! They could be killed, raped or worse!
Carl:
I don’t want some woman trying to carry my wounded ass out of a combat zone. A 115lb woman just cant do the job a 200 pound man can. Plus they get all emotional and fall apart at the drop of a hat.
The ACLU (rights advocate)
We could sue the military for letting this Marine get killed and putting a woman in harm’s way. “Her rights were violated by a bomb that would have never been there if it wasn’t for George W. Bush.”
Charlotte(Charli):
We have just as much pride and patriotism as men. We deserve the opportunity and honor of serving our country in any way we can. If I can meet the physical and psychological requirements that my male counterparts meet I should be eligible for the job no matter what position it places me in.
Brandi
Well, I just don’t think women should be required to do this. War is a guy thing and there are plenty of jobs here at home where we can make a contribution. We’re just not cut out for those types of things anyway.
Barbara (Bob)
I am a woman… Hear me roar. It should be a sliding scale for men and women. There are certain things men are required to do to qualify that are unrealistic for women. But, we should still be allowed to serve in combat. I can do anything a man can do.
The ACLU (rights obscurer)
We could sue the military for not allowing women to go to combat. Oops! Wait a minute. We already sued them for having the Marine in the wrong place… “It’s OK. We aren’t accountable for anything we do anyway.”
Tony (Me, the author)
One thing I can tell you about women in combat is simple. The ARE already there. The same goes with homosexuals in the armed forces and many other hotly debated military issues. Women have served a vital role in our military almost since it’s inception. Albeit it has not always been on the front lines they have always been there. Supporting, supplying, manufacturing and sadly enough, dieing. As early as The Revolution, so basically before we were a country, women have served.
http://userpages.aug.com/captbarb/femvets.html
Women have stood in the background and worked equally as hard for their freedoms as any man has and in many instances even harder. Come on guys! We didn’t have to protest for the right to vote or to even be counted as “other than property.”
The military has a way of letting things happen smoothly and in due time without a lot of upheaval. You can see evidence of this in the evolution of a woman’s role here in the Iraq war. You cannot admit a woman to The United States Marine Corps and say that women don’t serve in combat. Infantry is always the first job there. If the press and lawyers will stay out of it a natural transition will take place in our military. Her (the military complex) evolution will be slow and methodical as usual but it always seems to work itself out. It saddens me to see the death of any Marine, Sailor, Soldier or Airman but change is always painful. I hope that her family and friends view her as I and most of the rest of the country do. An American Hero who gave it all. An American Hero who gave her all. Simply put. A True American..
Jonathan:
Women are citizens just like men and they deserve the right and privilege of serving in our armed services in any role that they can qualify for following the same guidelines that their male counterparts use for qualification.
Larry(Butch):
It’s about time women risked their lives for the freedoms that they enjoy. By God there are more women in The US than men and only 10% of the force in Iraq! I tell ya its not fair being a man and expected to risk it all while women sit at home and risk nothing.
Juan:
Women are by nature more frail and weaker and shouldn’t be exposed to the rigors and risks involved in combat. While I feel that they are equal in other ways I think that’s a bit unrealistic to think that they would be involved in combat. What would happen in a hand-to-hand situation? Goodness! They could be killed, raped or worse!
Carl:
I don’t want some woman trying to carry my wounded ass out of a combat zone. A 115lb woman just cant do the job a 200 pound man can. Plus they get all emotional and fall apart at the drop of a hat.
The ACLU (rights advocate)
We could sue the military for letting this Marine get killed and putting a woman in harm’s way. “Her rights were violated by a bomb that would have never been there if it wasn’t for George W. Bush.”
Charlotte(Charli):
We have just as much pride and patriotism as men. We deserve the opportunity and honor of serving our country in any way we can. If I can meet the physical and psychological requirements that my male counterparts meet I should be eligible for the job no matter what position it places me in.
Brandi
Well, I just don’t think women should be required to do this. War is a guy thing and there are plenty of jobs here at home where we can make a contribution. We’re just not cut out for those types of things anyway.
Barbara (Bob)
I am a woman… Hear me roar. It should be a sliding scale for men and women. There are certain things men are required to do to qualify that are unrealistic for women. But, we should still be allowed to serve in combat. I can do anything a man can do.
The ACLU (rights obscurer)
We could sue the military for not allowing women to go to combat. Oops! Wait a minute. We already sued them for having the Marine in the wrong place… “It’s OK. We aren’t accountable for anything we do anyway.”
Tony (Me, the author)
One thing I can tell you about women in combat is simple. The ARE already there. The same goes with homosexuals in the armed forces and many other hotly debated military issues. Women have served a vital role in our military almost since it’s inception. Albeit it has not always been on the front lines they have always been there. Supporting, supplying, manufacturing and sadly enough, dieing. As early as The Revolution, so basically before we were a country, women have served.
http://userpages.aug.com/captbarb/femvets.html
Women have stood in the background and worked equally as hard for their freedoms as any man has and in many instances even harder. Come on guys! We didn’t have to protest for the right to vote or to even be counted as “other than property.”
The military has a way of letting things happen smoothly and in due time without a lot of upheaval. You can see evidence of this in the evolution of a woman’s role here in the Iraq war. You cannot admit a woman to The United States Marine Corps and say that women don’t serve in combat. Infantry is always the first job there. If the press and lawyers will stay out of it a natural transition will take place in our military. Her (the military complex) evolution will be slow and methodical as usual but it always seems to work itself out. It saddens me to see the death of any Marine, Sailor, Soldier or Airman but change is always painful. I hope that her family and friends view her as I and most of the rest of the country do. An American Hero who gave it all. An American Hero who gave her all. Simply put. A True American..
Sunday, June 19, 2005
How Religion and Politics Can (NOT) Blend
I'm sorry but I think these guys still don't get it. Religion and Law should be based on the same group of principals but the two should never be based on each other. Does that sound contradictory? It really isn't.
We have religious principals that prohibit theft. That arises from a core belief system that supports private property and ownership. In the end laws prohibit the same. If you made a law against theft based on the religious principal you would be entering a dangerously gray area.
That's an easy issue but what about the old sticky one... Abortion. Nearly anyone would say that infanticide is murder, but that's after the live birth. Most secular belief is that taking a human life should be prohibited. So now there is this gray area that concerns when that formation becomes a human and so on and so forth. I think this debate should be constrained to arguments that do NOT concern religion. Arguing it based on secular principals would be a much more legally stable platform.
What the religious right(usually wrong) don't get is that the more they involve their religion in politics the more politics is going to get involved in their religion. The zealots need to learn to live their lives the way they choose and feel free to instruct their children to do the same but they need to leave the law alone. Religion should be a choice and not a mandate.
Just remember as you see your religious freedoms swirling down the drain that it is you who invite the plumber to fix the pipes.
How Religion and Politics Can Blend - Yahoo! News: "Even a corner-of-the-eye glance at US politics this past year and the conclusion is obvious: Religion has played a polarizing role.
Abortion, stem-cell research, the war in Iraq, gay marriage, prayer in schools were and still are just some of the 2004 election campaign issues that brought out religious voices. Church activists played leading roles in making sure bans on same-sex marriages passed in 13 states. A Candidate's attendance or non-attendance at church in some cases became an issue. Even driving an SUV became a question to ask - 'What would Jesus drive?' - for left-leaning churches."
We have religious principals that prohibit theft. That arises from a core belief system that supports private property and ownership. In the end laws prohibit the same. If you made a law against theft based on the religious principal you would be entering a dangerously gray area.
That's an easy issue but what about the old sticky one... Abortion. Nearly anyone would say that infanticide is murder, but that's after the live birth. Most secular belief is that taking a human life should be prohibited. So now there is this gray area that concerns when that formation becomes a human and so on and so forth. I think this debate should be constrained to arguments that do NOT concern religion. Arguing it based on secular principals would be a much more legally stable platform.
What the religious right(usually wrong) don't get is that the more they involve their religion in politics the more politics is going to get involved in their religion. The zealots need to learn to live their lives the way they choose and feel free to instruct their children to do the same but they need to leave the law alone. Religion should be a choice and not a mandate.
Just remember as you see your religious freedoms swirling down the drain that it is you who invite the plumber to fix the pipes.
How Religion and Politics Can Blend - Yahoo! News: "Even a corner-of-the-eye glance at US politics this past year and the conclusion is obvious: Religion has played a polarizing role.
Abortion, stem-cell research, the war in Iraq, gay marriage, prayer in schools were and still are just some of the 2004 election campaign issues that brought out religious voices. Church activists played leading roles in making sure bans on same-sex marriages passed in 13 states. A Candidate's attendance or non-attendance at church in some cases became an issue. Even driving an SUV became a question to ask - 'What would Jesus drive?' - for left-leaning churches."
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
The ACLU should change its name
The ACLU has to be the most blatantly anti-Amercan group on the planet. Two weeks ago they were bashing the US for kicking a Muslim holy book but this week they want you to think it's OK to desecrate our flag. WTF... Over! I have never seen such blatant stupidity in all my life. Anything, and I do mean ANYTHING that is patriotic, American, Christian or white is fair game but if it's an anti-American group, movement or concept it should be protected and all it's sentimentalities should be revered by all. I am issuing a challenge. Someone please explain why the Koran should be revered but not the flag of the United States or the Christian Bible.
Vote on flag desecration may be 'cliffhanger' - Yahoo! News: "The Senate may be within one or two votes of passing a constitutional amendment to ban desecration of the U.S. flag, clearing the way for ratification by the states, a key opponent of the measure said Tuesday.
ADVERTISEMENT
'It's scary close,' said Terri Schroeder of the American Civil Liberties Union, which opposes the amendment. 'People think it's something that's never going to happen. ... The reality is we're very close to losing this battle.'"
Vote on flag desecration may be 'cliffhanger' - Yahoo! News: "The Senate may be within one or two votes of passing a constitutional amendment to ban desecration of the U.S. flag, clearing the way for ratification by the states, a key opponent of the measure said Tuesday.
ADVERTISEMENT
'It's scary close,' said Terri Schroeder of the American Civil Liberties Union, which opposes the amendment. 'People think it's something that's never going to happen. ... The reality is we're very close to losing this battle.'"
Wednesday, June 08, 2005
Go! Go! Dean
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
I read two interesting articles today on the net. Both leave me totally confused about the mind set of the Democratic Party. It’s like they keep sticking their hand in boiling water, they see it hurts, so in order to fix it they stick it in to the elbow next time and bang! Then they go ahead and dive the rest of the way in.
After the Dems lost the election to W the first time they stepped back and said, “You know, if the American people knew what we were all about they would elect us.” So they got the word out and shifted a little further to the left and it really turned the voters off so in the midterm election they lost a few more seats in congress.
Along comes Nancy Pelosi and she says to them that they are not left enough so they go further from the center. That costs them another Whitehouse bid and a few more seats on the hill.
Understand that this is a critique of the Dems and not a defense of Republicans or conservatives in general. They just don’t get it. Dems are so out of touch with the average American that they just sound, feel and taste totally out of reasonable bounds. Now to prove that they still believe that the “just need to get the word out,” they have placed the most left oddball on the planet in their leadership position at the DNC. Howard Dean. Dean has the nerve to suggest racial and religious factionalism when he is from the most racist state in the US. He has no hint of an idea what integration is all about. All across the south Black men and women are prospering at a constantly accelerating rate by far out striding their northern and western contemporaries.
Then Dean opens his mouth and just embarrasses his entire party with his far-far-left rhetoric. The only thing I can think of is that the Dems hired him so that he could let the nation see how ridiculously left they could be in order to fire him and look like they are gonna try to center up a bit.
After hiring Dean as DNC boss they go on a hunt for the anti-Arnold candidate in California to try to defeat Schwarzenegger. Arnold is hugely popular. Why not look for someone with some of the same qualities who is more to their political liking. No! They are going to stand up and as the elitists that they are they are going to tell you what you should think, should feel and by god who you should be more like.
All I can say to the Dems is, “Go, Go Dean!” Keep up that rhetoric and keep telling people that you know better for them what they should think and you loose a dozen more seats in this next election and your party will be relegated to history.
Zimbabwe's president denies he's dead - Africa - MSNBC.com
I'm sorry but there is just a great deal of humor here. I love hearing good news for a change. For once we are hearing the someone is NOT dead.
Zimbabwe's president denies he's dead - Africa - MSNBC.com: "�I told the president that he is reportedly dead from last week as a result of heart failure. He laughed and said: �When did I die and where?�� the paper quoted Mugabe�s spokesman George Charamba as saying."
Zimbabwe's president denies he's dead - Africa - MSNBC.com: "�I told the president that he is reportedly dead from last week as a result of heart failure. He laughed and said: �When did I die and where?�� the paper quoted Mugabe�s spokesman George Charamba as saying."
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
When will China answer for Tiananmen massacre? - Yahoo! News
When will China answer for Tiananmen massacre? - Yahoo! News: "Time naturally erodes indignation. But now, more than ever, China's communist leaders need pushing to disclose what happened. No country that keeps such tight political control can be a trusted member of the international community. "
This is a big call here. We in the US want China to own up to it’s massacres but we still haven’t explained why we murdered millions of Native Americans here. We still haven’t explained why we murdered David Koresh’s followers, including their children. Maybe we should cast the beam from our own eye before we offer to remove the mote from our brother’s.
This is a big call here. We in the US want China to own up to it’s massacres but we still haven’t explained why we murdered millions of Native Americans here. We still haven’t explained why we murdered David Koresh’s followers, including their children. Maybe we should cast the beam from our own eye before we offer to remove the mote from our brother’s.
Friday, June 03, 2005
Deep Throat' is more hero than villain - Says the Press
On balance, 'Deep Throat' is more hero than villain - Yahoo! News: "Felt revered the FBI and despised the White House for manipulating the agency politically. Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward wrote Thursday that Felt 'thought the Nixon team were Nazis' and feared for the country's future."
It is amazing to me how what Felts did can possibly make him a hero. He knew of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” committed by the president and he did nothing accept leak it to the press. I am willing to bet that that is a felony. The obvious reason to most of us is that he was passed over by Nixon for the #1 job in the FBI and he was getting even. While Nixon was a slimy character at best the truth is the secret tapes and such were going on before Nixon was caught. I am NOT saying it was OK for Nixon to do it. Just that the FBI knew when Johnson was doing it too.
You will never hear the truth here from the press in this country because Watergate was their finest moment. It is when the press in the US deposed a president. They love it, love the power and thank goodness they will never have that power again. There is no doubt in anyone’s mind that this guy should be brought up on charges for what he did. The information he leaked was clearly classified. If he wanted to do something he should have had Nixon investigated.
The one thing I will have to give Felts credit for is that he did steal Woodward’s thunder by revealing the story. I’m sure Woodward was salivating over the day that Felts died so he could do some more grandstanding. Woodward is a has been and so is Felts. Good riddance to them both. Sour grapes are never a good reason to commit felonies and then enrich yourself.
Tonyh
It is amazing to me how what Felts did can possibly make him a hero. He knew of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” committed by the president and he did nothing accept leak it to the press. I am willing to bet that that is a felony. The obvious reason to most of us is that he was passed over by Nixon for the #1 job in the FBI and he was getting even. While Nixon was a slimy character at best the truth is the secret tapes and such were going on before Nixon was caught. I am NOT saying it was OK for Nixon to do it. Just that the FBI knew when Johnson was doing it too.
You will never hear the truth here from the press in this country because Watergate was their finest moment. It is when the press in the US deposed a president. They love it, love the power and thank goodness they will never have that power again. There is no doubt in anyone’s mind that this guy should be brought up on charges for what he did. The information he leaked was clearly classified. If he wanted to do something he should have had Nixon investigated.
The one thing I will have to give Felts credit for is that he did steal Woodward’s thunder by revealing the story. I’m sure Woodward was salivating over the day that Felts died so he could do some more grandstanding. Woodward is a has been and so is Felts. Good riddance to them both. Sour grapes are never a good reason to commit felonies and then enrich yourself.
Tonyh
Thursday, June 02, 2005
Go NASCAR
I'd like to second this writers commentary on NASCAR. Although I don't understand why it would be "corney or redneckish" to display your patriotism. The left has really done a number on this country when a man or woman feels the have to be embarrassed by their respect and love of their country.
tonyh
Yahoo! Sports - NASCAR - Trading Paint: Jumping on Junior: "I watched the race this weekend on TV as I usually do. Every weekend no matter if it is a holiday or not, they televise the invocation, National Anthem and any other special honors, such as they did with Taps this weekend for Memorial Day. Is there any special reason that NASCAR does this and not any of the other televised sports? Being prior military and married to an active duty serviceman, honestly, it is one of the reasons I am such a big fan of NASCAR and as happy to watch it on TV as watching it live. I think it's awesome that NASCAR supports the troops as visually as they do. I'm just wondering if there was any special reason other than their love of this country.
Rebecca Sherman
Edwards AFB, Calif.
I have to give credit to NASCAR for the things you mention, Rebecca. It helps give fans some patriotic spirit. Plus, with NASCAR's heavy involvement with the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and National Guard as sponsors � and the fact so many of our enlisted men and women also are NASCAR fans � it's a no-brainer to show support to those who are protecting our liberties. The NFL, Major League Baseball, NBA and NHL � even the PGA � could take a few lessons from NASCAR's patriotism. It may seem kind of corny or redneck-ish, but I'll take that any day. "
tonyh
Yahoo! Sports - NASCAR - Trading Paint: Jumping on Junior: "I watched the race this weekend on TV as I usually do. Every weekend no matter if it is a holiday or not, they televise the invocation, National Anthem and any other special honors, such as they did with Taps this weekend for Memorial Day. Is there any special reason that NASCAR does this and not any of the other televised sports? Being prior military and married to an active duty serviceman, honestly, it is one of the reasons I am such a big fan of NASCAR and as happy to watch it on TV as watching it live. I think it's awesome that NASCAR supports the troops as visually as they do. I'm just wondering if there was any special reason other than their love of this country.
Rebecca Sherman
Edwards AFB, Calif.
I have to give credit to NASCAR for the things you mention, Rebecca. It helps give fans some patriotic spirit. Plus, with NASCAR's heavy involvement with the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and National Guard as sponsors � and the fact so many of our enlisted men and women also are NASCAR fans � it's a no-brainer to show support to those who are protecting our liberties. The NFL, Major League Baseball, NBA and NHL � even the PGA � could take a few lessons from NASCAR's patriotism. It may seem kind of corny or redneck-ish, but I'll take that any day. "
Wednesday, June 01, 2005
Hooray! for France? Did I say that?
Dutch Voters Reject EU Constitution - Yahoo! News: "AMSTERDAM, Netherlands - Dutch voters overwhelmingly rejected the European Union constitution Wednesday, delivering what could be a knockout blow for the charter roundly defeated just days ago by France. "
You rarely see me say anything positive about France. Their recent history has been pretty shady in my opinion. Americans are always quick to point out that, "they'd be speaking German if it wasn't for us." But we seem to forget that we may very well still be an English colony without the help of France. I do have to tip my hat to the French and Dutch for their rejection of this EU constitution. I think it bodes well for the US down the road as well.
Just as soon as an EU constitution is ratified the UN will be after a worldwide version of the same. In the US that would mean subjugating our constitutional principles to that of the rest of the world. I just don’t see how that can help us out in any way. The rest of the world needs to stay out of the business of governing the US.
Recently a Supreme Court justice referenced world opinion in one of his rulings. That sent a chill up my spine. Imagine what would happen to the Bill of Rights if it had to be interpreted in light of world opinion. Sovereign countries need to govern themselves. The rest of the world kind of needs to stay out of it.
Good job France! Good job Netherlands!
Tonyh
You rarely see me say anything positive about France. Their recent history has been pretty shady in my opinion. Americans are always quick to point out that, "they'd be speaking German if it wasn't for us." But we seem to forget that we may very well still be an English colony without the help of France. I do have to tip my hat to the French and Dutch for their rejection of this EU constitution. I think it bodes well for the US down the road as well.
Just as soon as an EU constitution is ratified the UN will be after a worldwide version of the same. In the US that would mean subjugating our constitutional principles to that of the rest of the world. I just don’t see how that can help us out in any way. The rest of the world needs to stay out of the business of governing the US.
Recently a Supreme Court justice referenced world opinion in one of his rulings. That sent a chill up my spine. Imagine what would happen to the Bill of Rights if it had to be interpreted in light of world opinion. Sovereign countries need to govern themselves. The rest of the world kind of needs to stay out of it.
Good job France! Good job Netherlands!
Tonyh
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)